* * *
Although William 133's first wife whom he married at Shotley died 9months and two weeks after they married, there does not appear to be achild that would result from this union. There is the problem of somemonuments still standing at Blanchland Abbey not legible. The monumentbeing made of sandstone is barely standing, and probably is for Eliz.However I think that even if it were an offspring, it would probably bean end of line.Was witness to several marriages at Blanchland.
Signed his name with an 'x', his mark.
Died 9 months and two weeks after her marriage to William Temperley
Died young.
Died young.
Unless the birth date is discovered, the christening date will beduplicated as the birth date. Often the situation appears where anindividual is baptized much later in life.
Stublock Pithouse could be either the pithouse near Fallowfield,
or the mine still functioning under the name of Dinning in 1880
at Langley:
Stublick, Langley Mills, Executors of Joseph Dinning.The is as per COLLIERIES OF THE UNITED KINGDOM AT WORK IN, 1880.
[online] http://www.cmhrc.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/list80.htmNicholas' will notated him as 'Coal miner of Pit House Stoblock. TheDinning mine might be Stublock number 9, and Nicholas' Pit House may havebeen a different shaft.
Nicholas' also bequethed some heraditments to 'Nephew John Temperley'.
* * * * * * * * * *
John 135's son John 1355 is referred to as John Temporley A or B 1355because there is a records conflict in that John 1351 A or B was thoughtto be John 135's son.Thread A is abitrarily assigned a letter. The possibility that John1351, who married Annie Pearson, descends from a different John maintainsthis thread. The verified records of John 5's son John by Mary Oxleysupports this thread to the extent that Thread A is hard to contradictand is based on hard evidence.
Thread A appears to be correct. Thread B has to be mutually exclusive.
Thread B is arbitrarily assigned a letter. The probability that the Johnwho marries Annie Pearson is not the son of this John is great. Thepossible ascent to another individual is maintains this thread. It isnot likely that John 1351 B would be baptized again and then marry AnnElliot before marrying again to Annie Pearson - logic would have it thatthey are separate individuals.
When John Temperley senior dies 11.2.1797 he is described (BishopTranscripts) as a Farmer and senior member of Vestry at Warden church. Hesigns the completed transcripts for the years that he is in office(1774-1798) University Archives Durham
At this time, a copy of the manuscripts for the funeral song written byJohn Scott non-conformist minister for 'Mrs. H. Temperley' in 1814 hasnot been ordered, but the content summary appears herein.
There is a possibility that the family may have changed churchaffiliation subsequent to John #135's death, presumably by 1814.
Occupation: farmer, was a Vestry member of the Warden church also.
John Temperley was a Vestry member at Warden Church and signs the BishopTranscripts for several years. He was succeeded by his son Henry. Johnwas a member of the Vestry 1774-1794. Henry was a member of the Vestry1789-1799. In Warden churchyard there is the tombstone of John Temperleyof Fourstones Fell House died 8th February 1797 aged 77 yrs he is buriedwith daughter Ann; however the rest of the monument is illegible.
* * *
Thread B in the descendancy of John 5 attaches this individual to thetree. However, without this thread, this individual is not attached tothe tree, and his parentage is unknown. Mary Oxley is evidently not thisindividuals mother.
Rschr EW who tracked down the records for this family, believes MaryOxley was the daughter of Edward Oxley, and was c. 22nd April 1722 atHexham. There is a discrepancy in date of birth with age at death butspeculatively EW will endeavor to determine whether a) she did not reallyknow her age or b) whether this was a daughter who died and Mary was asecond daughter given the same name. It could also be that the LDS havetranscribed incorrectly. This often seems to be the problem. At somepoint, the original record will be reviewed.
Died young.
November 14 1792 Edward Temperley Gentleman of Warden bondsman to ThomasRobinson Gentleman of Hexham and Mary Temperley.
12. Uknown2 TEMPERLEY-X.4.2. Unknown
[circa 1700]
* * *This is an unknown individual, placed to link the Hunstanworth line tothe chronology. The Hunstanworth Temperleys are not proved to be linked.This simply ties in the lineage with the software so that the modifiedregister will print in its entirety. The numbers given are a best guessof where they would fit if they were proved.
The lineages numbered with an 'x' are not linked, but numbered to placeon the chronology.
X.4.1. if bride would be numbered X.4.2.
There was a burial of a Thomas Timperley in Darlington, and upon checkingother burial listings, he was the only Timperley with an i in NortheastEngland buried before 1800. There weren't any Timperley's with an i inNortheast England in the 1700's - except the burial. Although this istotally unproven, it is a possibile link.